Back to Page & Provenance
For Editors
The practical resource for book editors.
Editing types, rate benchmarks, editorial letter structures, client onboarding guides, fiction vs nonfiction considerations, and professional org resources — for new editors building practice and experienced editors sharpening theirs.
Types of editing
Book editing is not a single service. Different editorial disciplines operate at different stages of the manuscript's development and address fundamentally different concerns. Misidentifying what kind of editing a manuscript needs is one of the most common problems in the author-editor relationship.
| Type | Focus | Typical deliverable | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developmental editing | Structure, pacing, character, premise, plot logic, thematic coherence | Editorial letter + manuscript notes | Early revision — after complete draft |
| Substantive / structural editing | Organization, argumentation, section-level clarity (especially nonfiction) | Inline notes + structural memo | Before line edit |
| Line editing | Sentence-level prose, rhythm, clarity, voice consistency | Inline tracked changes | After structure is stable |
| Copyediting | Grammar, punctuation, consistency, style guide adherence, factual flags | Tracked changes + style sheet | After line edit |
| Proofreading | Typos, formatting errors, final print/layout issues | Marked page proofs | Final stage before publication |
Scope creep note
Bundling multiple editing types into a single project agreement without clear scope definition is a common source of conflict. Contracts should specify exactly which service is being performed and at which stage.
Rates and compensation
Editorial rates vary by editing type, project complexity, manuscript length, schedule, and the editor's experience and market positioning. There is no single correct rate, but the Editorial Freelancers Association (EFA) publishes survey-based benchmarks that serve as widely cited references.
| Service | EFA median rate | Common billing basis |
|---|---|---|
| Developmental editing | $0.079/word (median) | Per word, per hour, or flat project fee |
| Line editing | $0.054/word (median) | Per word or hourly |
| Copyediting | $0.030–$0.050/word | Per word or hourly |
| Proofreading | $0.022–$0.030/word | Per word or per page |
Rates above are approximate reference values. Always check the EFA rates page for current survey data.
Official rates reference
- ↗EFA Editorial Rates — Survey-based rates by service type, updated regularly
- ↗Editorial Freelancers Association — Professional org, job board, and resources for editorial freelancers
Rate-setting considerations
- Hourly rates protect editors on slow, difficult manuscripts; per-word or flat fees reward efficiency
- Set clear turnaround windows in the contract — urgency premiums (25–50%) are reasonable for rush work
- Track actual hours for the first several projects to calibrate per-project estimates accurately
- Genre affects difficulty — highly technical nonfiction, heavily researched historical fiction, and poetry take longer per word than standard commercial fiction
Fiction vs nonfiction editing
Fiction and nonfiction require different editorial frameworks. Understanding the distinctions makes scoping, pricing, and feedback delivery more precise.
Fiction editing focuses on
- ✓Story structure and pacing
- ✓Character arc consistency
- ✓Point of view stability
- ✓Scene-level purpose and tension
- ✓Dialogue authenticity
- ✓Internal logic and world-building consistency
Nonfiction editing focuses on
- ✓Argument structure and logic
- ✓Evidence quality and sourcing
- ✓Chapter and section organization
- ✓Audience accessibility
- ✓Author voice and credibility
- ✓Factual accuracy flags
Where they overlap
- Line editing addresses sentence-level clarity in both
- Copyediting conventions are largely consistent across both
- Narrative nonfiction (memoir, literary journalism) blends both frameworks
Editorial letter structure
An editorial letter is the primary deliverable for a developmental or structural edit. A well-structured letter gives the writer a clear picture of the manuscript's strengths and its most important revision targets — prioritized so the writer knows where to start.
Opening frame
Acknowledge the project's strengths and what is working. This is not performative — it helps the writer understand what to protect during revision.
Core structural notes
The most significant structural issues, in priority order. Three to five major concerns is typical for a full developmental edit. More than that can overwhelm.
Character and arc notes
For fiction: character development, motivation consistency, relationship dynamics. For nonfiction: authorial presence and audience relationship.
Scene or section-level notes
Issues that do not rise to structural priority but affect specific chapters or sections.
Line-level patterns (optional)
If there are recurring prose habits worth addressing, flag them as patterns rather than line-editing the full manuscript.
Closing guidance
What the writer should prioritize first, and what can wait until the structural pass is done.
Tone guidelines
- Be direct about problems — vague feedback wastes the writer's time
- Distinguish between structural issues (must fix) and craft observations (worth considering)
- Avoid over-prescribing solutions — name the problem clearly and trust the writer to solve it
- Editorial letters are typically 2,000–5,000 words for a full manuscript
Client onboarding
The quality of the editorial relationship is often determined before the work begins. A clear onboarding process sets expectations, reduces scope creep, and builds the trust necessary for honest feedback to land well.
Before the project starts
- ✓Sample edit (usually first 5–15 pages) to assess the manuscript and confirm fit
- ✓Written agreement specifying: editing type, word count, deliverables, timeline, rate, revision round policy, and payment terms
- ✓Pre-project questionnaire: author's goals, revision history, concerns, intended audience, comparable titles
Managing expectations
- Clarify explicitly what is and is not included — developmental vs line edit boundaries especially
- State the revision round policy upfront: how many rounds of questions does the rate include?
- Discuss how feedback will be delivered and what format the final deliverable takes
After delivery
- Follow up briefly to confirm receipt and answer clarification questions (within agreed scope)
- Ask for a testimonial — writers who are satisfied are usually glad to provide one when asked directly
- Keep a record of each project for rate calibration and portfolio development
Finding clients
Editorial work is largely a referral-based business. The first clients are the hardest to get; each satisfied client becomes a marketing channel.
Starting platforms
- Reedsy — curated freelance marketplace; high-quality clients; Reedsy takes a commission
- EFA Job Board — editorial jobs and project postings from publishers and authors
- Upwork — broader freelance platform; variable client quality; works well for portfolio-building early on
- Absolute Write — writer community where editors can build visibility
Building long-term referrals
- A simple professional website with your services, rates range, and a few testimonials converts cold traffic
- Visibility in writing communities (Facebook groups, Reddit, genre-specific Discord servers) builds awareness
- Conference attendance (AWP, Romance Writers of America, SCBWI) generates direct referrals
- Collaborating with other editors for overflow work creates a mutual referral network
Professional organizations
Professional membership organizations provide rate benchmarks, job listings, professional development, and industry legitimacy. EFA membership is the most widely recognized credential for independent book editors in North America; CIEP is its UK counterpart.
Key organizations
- ↗Editorial Freelancers Association (EFA) — Primary professional org for US editorial freelancers; job board, rates, member directory
- ↗Chartered Institute of Editing and Proofreading (CIEP) — UK professional body for editors and proofreaders; training, standards, and member directory
- ↗EFA Rate Chart — Survey-based benchmark rates by service type
- ↗Editors Canada — Professional association for Canadian editors; standards and certification
- ↗Reedsy — Editorial marketplace and professional community; blog has strong craft and business content
Style guides editors work with
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS) — the primary style authority for US trade book publishing; covers grammar, usage, citations, and manuscript conventions
- Associated Press Stylebook (AP) — standard for journalism and media; used in some nonfiction and reference contexts
- APA Publication Manual — standard for academic and psychology publishing; citation-heavy
- Publisher house style — most trade publishers and large independents maintain in-house style guides that override or supplement CMOS; always request these before beginning a project
- Merriam-Webster — standard dictionary reference for CMOS-based projects; used for spelling preference resolution
What editors should understand about writers and agents
Writers
Writers hiring freelance editors are often doing so before they have fully exhausted their own revision process — or because they feel stuck and hope the editor will solve a problem they have not yet isolated. Strong onboarding helps editors identify what kind of support a writer actually needs versus what they are asking for.
- Many writers conflate editing types and benefit from upfront clarification
- Emotional investment in the manuscript is high; tone in feedback matters
- Writers querying soon may be under time pressure that affects revision capacity
Agents
Freelance editors and literary agents both serve writers, but in entirely different capacities. Agents do not typically refer clients to freelance editors, but understanding the agent side of the business helps editors advise writers appropriately.
- A strong editorial edit before querying can materially improve a manuscript's chances
- Agents sometimes provide R&R (revise and resubmit) feedback — this is not the same as a developmental edit
- Editors should be cautious about making promises regarding publishability or agent interest
Common editor questions
Should editors charge by the hour, by the word, or by the project?
All three are legitimate and have different risk profiles. Per-word or per-project rates reward efficiency but can backfire on unexpectedly difficult manuscripts. Hourly rates protect the editor when a manuscript requires more work than expected but may feel less predictable to clients. Many experienced editors use project rates built from hourly estimates, with a scope provision if the manuscript is materially different from what was represented.
What is the difference between copyediting and proofreading?
Copyediting addresses grammar, punctuation, consistency, and adherence to a style guide — performed on a working manuscript before layout. Proofreading checks for errors in typeset, laid-out text: typos, formatting issues, widows and orphans, and final print errors. They are different stages and should not be conflated. Proofreading a pre-layout manuscript is not the same as proofreading page proofs.
Can an editor guarantee publication?
No. Editorial editing and publishing are separate evaluations. A strong manuscript will be better after a strong editorial pass — that is the value of the work. Whether it then attracts an agent or publisher depends on market fit, timing, and factors the editor has no visibility into. Any editor who implies otherwise is misrepresenting the service.
Is a sample edit required?
Not required, but it is widely considered best practice for developmental and line editing. It protects both parties: the editor confirms they can work with the material, and the writer confirms the editor's style is a fit.
When should I turn down a project?
When the manuscript is outside your genre expertise, when the client's expectations cannot be met within the scope they want to pay for, when the timeline is not feasible, or when pre-project communication suggests the working relationship would be difficult.
Downloads and templates
Downloadable reference templates for book editors. Downloadable reference templates for book editors.
Editorial Letter Template
Structured skeleton for developmental editorial letters with section guidance.
Client Intake Questionnaire
Pre-project questions covering goals, revision history, timeline, and audience.
Project Agreement Template
Freelance editing contract covering scope, deliverables, rate, and revision policy.
Copyediting Style Sheet
Blank style sheet template for tracking decisions during a copyediting pass.
All templates are available through the Studio templates library. See also the Studio hub.
Disclaimer: Page & Provenance Studio templates and checklists are educational resources only and do not constitute legal, financial, accounting, or other professional advice. They may not be complete, current, or appropriate for your specific circumstances. You are solely responsible for how you use and adapt any resource, and you should consult your own qualified advisers before relying on it in contracts, negotiations, or other legal or financial decisions. By downloading or using Studio resources, you agree to the Studio section of our Terms & Conditions.